For all the slick Wear OS tricks and comprehensive fitness features that the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic offers, battery life is somewhat of a letdown. Even with an average day of usage involving continuous heart rate monitoring and GPS tracking for outdoor workouts, you will find yourself looking for the charging puck at the end of the day.
- The losses and gains
- A convenience burdened with caveats
- Standing out, but the wrong way
- I was not ready for this reality check
Samsung ships a wireless charging puck in the retail package. But this one takes about two hours to fully juice up the 46mm variant of the Galaxy Watch 4 Classic. That’s a bit too slow, considering the fact that smartwatches half its asking price — such as the divisive OnePlus Watch — take just about an hour to go from empty to 100%.
My point here is that you might want to buy an extra charger for your office desk, just to make sure it doesn’t run out of juice midway through a busy day. Thankfully, the Galaxy Watch 4 and Watch 4 Classic can be juiced up by a phone without any wire hassles. Just put it at the back of your phone, and watch the smartwatch trickle charge. But as convenient as that sounds, there are a lot of caveats.
The losses and gains
Let’s start with the charging speed first. Samsung offers a feature called Reverse Power Sharing on its phones that support wireless charging. Just enable it from the quick settings panel, put your smartwatch or earbuds case on the phone’s rear panel, and watch the energy transfer happen in real-time.
But the rate of power transfer is quite slow. I performed three test runs of the Galaxy Watch 4 Classic (46mm) being brought to life from 0% power to full charge, and it took the Galaxy S22 Ultra nearly three and half hours to do the job, on average.
Here’s the most recent breakdown of the charging process, conducted in a room at 75 degrees Fahrenheit, and both the devices lying still.
|Time on the clock||Battery level on Galaxy Watch 4 Classic||Battery level on Galaxy S22 Ultra||Temp. of phone (in Fahrenheit)|
|10:30 am||0%||100%||96.8 degrees|
|10:50 am||7%||95%||102.2 degrees|
|11:30 am||20%||88%||102.2 degrees|
|11:42 am||25%||86%||104 degrees|
|12:28 pm||50%||76%||104 degrees|
|12:51 pm||67%||71%||104 degrees|
|01:15 pm||80%||63%||105.8 degrees|
|02:10 pm||100%||56%||105.8 degrees|
From the table, it might appear that charging the Galaxy Watch 4 Classic’s tiny battery sucks up nearly all the power from Galaxy S22 Ultra’s 5,000 mAh battery. But a healthy portion of that battery drain is due to tasks running in the background and idle battery consumption. Expect that number to be much higher for a phone with a smaller unit such as the Galaxy S22.
During the charging process, the temperature of the phone’s back initially rose by around 4 degrees but stabilized after that point. But there are outlier scenarios. While working in a garden with the outdoor temperature at a searing 93 degrees Fahrenheit, the rear panel’s temperature rose by about 9 degrees, all the way up to 113 degrees Fahrenheit.
However, that rise in temperature is temporary and stays that way as long as the phone’s wireless charging coil is transferring power. Within 5 to 10 minutes, things return to normal. In a nutshell, heating was not an issue during the test phase.
A convenience burdened with caveats
The key takeaway here is that reverse power sharing is nothing short of a lifesaver for a Galaxy smartwatch running low on juice. If you have the patience to keep your phone and smartwatch untouched for an hour, you will get at around 20% to 25% power transferred to a compatible Samsung smartwatch.
That is enough to last a whole day, with some sacrifices. Disabling always-on display, lowering on-screen brightness, and pausing continuous heart rate monitoring are among the moves you need to make to pull through a whole day on just a quarter of a full tank. Or, you can simply enable power saving mode, which can net you two hours on just 5% battery.
Switching to the Watch-only mode, which only shows a digital clock and kills every other UI and sensor functionality, will last you about 23 hours with that amount of power. But you will need the discipline to leave your phone and watch still and untouched to get a meaningful amount of reverse wireless charging done in the first place.
If you’re at the desk, that won’t be a problem. But if you’re on the move, finding a stable surface to keep the two devices locked in place — especially with their smooth contact surfaces always trying to slip away — is quite a struggle. As I pointed out earlier, it’s a convenience plagued with caveats.
Standing out, but the wrong way
Unfortunately, that’s just the tip of the bad news iceberg. While slow charging can be forgiven, compatibility issues give a whole other meaning to the very convenience at hand. I’ll put it in clear terms – if you seek the facility of charging your Samsung smartwatch with a phone, you must have a Samsung phone.
That’s because the Galaxy Watch 4 is not compatible with Qi wireless charging standard. Instead, Samsung’s latest smartwatches rely on the WPC-based wireless charging protocol. To put it simply, your fancy Android flagship with reverse wireless charging support can’t charge your Galaxy Watch unless it’s from Samsung.
I tried the Xiaomi 12 Pro — which supports reverse power sharing — but it wouldn’t charge the Galaxy Watch 4 Classic. The OnePlus 10 Pro was no different. To rub salt on the wound, I could easily charge the Galaxy S22 Ultra by putting it on the Xiaomi 12 Pro and the OnePlus 10 Pro’s rear panel.
For better or worse, this weird charging standard situation for the Galaxy Watch 4 and its predecessors is a morbidly disappointing example of ecosystem locking. If you have a Samsung flagship, starting from the Galaxy S10 series, the Galaxy Note 10 family, or any of Samsung’s foldable phones, you’re safe.
But it’s not just the phones where the charging standard fiasco proves to be an obstacle. It is quite likely that the third-party Qi wireless charger lying in your drawer won’t do the job unless it has the Samsung logo on it. Yes, there are third-party options, like this neat USB-C magnetic puck from Elebase, but they don’t come free.
I was not ready for this reality check
I started this whole test around reverse charging a Galaxy Watch using a smartphone out of pure curiosity. However, I ended up finding more problems with Samsung’s ecosystem than I was ready to digest. Samsung’s Galaxy Watch 4 is the top choice for Wear OS-based smartwatches, and its successors might well retain that crown.
But locking a convenience as crucial as reverse power-sharing behind an outdated charging standard is simply unacceptable. Even more so when so much of the smartwatch ecosystem has embraced the Qi wireless charging standard, as have Android smartphone makers.
Pushing the Galaxy Watch behind an ecosystem wall doesn’t make any sense. It is simply a step back for Samsung, a kick in the gut for the ecosystem, and a frustrating situation for users. I enjoy the perks of reverse power sharing, but that’s only because I have a pricey Samsung phone in my hands.
For everyone else seeking the benefits of reverse wireless charging for a smartwatch, the likes of Mobvoi and Fossil will happily serve you a capable device. These smartwatches will work just fine with any Android smartphone that supports reverse wireless charging, including Samsung’s own.
Galaxy S23 owners need to be on the lookout for this update
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is shaping up to be a Galaxy S23 Ultra killer
Our honest thoughts on the Galaxy S23 Ultra’s 200MP camera
Samsung Galaxy Watch 6: the 6 things that would make it amazing
You may want to think twice about buying a Samsung or Pixel phone